Any article in a particular category can be accessed via the corresponding category on the menu bar at the top of the page. Any article in a particular release can be accessed via the corresponding release on the right sidebar.
This website began in October 2006, and the website has been redesigned twice, once in October 2008, and the second time in November 2009.
We welcome comments from readers. Readers can directly submit their comments at the end of any article.]]>
Two persons, one a Chinese citizen and one a Japanese citizen, have done the most to lead this movement so that justice can be restored and history will not be forgotten. This article provides a short summary of these two people, Tong Zeng (童增) of China and Tamaki Matsuoka (松岡環) of Japan.
Tong Zeng (童增) – Who Speaks for the Voiceless: Although millions of Chinese people suffered great atrocities under the Japanese military in the form of massacres, rapes and kidnapped comfort women, slave laborers, biological and chemical weapon attacks, vivisection as POWs. The instigators never admitted to their guilt and basically never punished. The victims never received any apology and were never financially compensated for their sufferings.
When China and Japan established diplomatic relationship on September 29, 1972, in the interest of the friendship between the Chinese and the Japanese people, China, as a gesture of good will, renounced its demand for war reparation from Japan, i.e., the Chinese government no longer required the Japanese government to pay reparation for the damages it did to China during WWII and the Second Sino-Japanese War.
As a young man studying for a masters degree in law, Tong Zeng investigated various international legal cases and issues regarding compensation related to atrocities committed during a war by one country on the citizens of another country. He concluded that there are “war reparations” and “damage compensations.” The former, “war reparations,” are compensations for the losses that the defeated countries launching the war caused to the countries they invaded. The latter, “damage compensations” are compensations for the sufferings and losses of the people of the invaded countries caused by acts of the invading militaries violating the laws of war and humanitarian principles.
In July 1990 he wrote a White Paper “China Demands Japan to Compensate Atrocity Victims.”  Although initially he received no interest in any newspaper on the contents of his White Paper, on March 31, 1991 he got the newspaper Ming Bao in Hong Kong to post a short article about it. Then a couple of days later, he distributed copies of his White Paper to various delegates on their way to attend the National People’s Congress (NPC) in Beijing. Several delegates showed interest in his proposal. Although it was too late to discuss this in the 1991 NPC, it was taken up as a topic of discussion in the 1992 NPC. When news of this discussion was reported in the mass media, it ignited a brush fire across the whole country.
Seeking compensation for the atrocities committed by the Japanese military was a long-overdue item for seeking justice and closure that has been buried in the hearts and souls of thousands and thousands of Chinese atrocity victims and their relatives. During the next few years, thousands of people wrote to Tong Zeng endorsing and thanking him for his proposal and wrote to him providing details of the atrocities that they or their family members had experienced. Within a few years, he had received about 10,000 such letters.  This became an archive of letters of historical significance that document the atrocities experienced by the victims and written by the victims or their close relatives.
Here are excerpts of a few sample letters that were sent to Tong Zeng starting in the 1990s .
Written on 12/15/1992 by Tang Qiangshen of Zhejiang Province, with the first part of the quote referring to air bombing: “More than 8,000 people died from being buried alive, burning to death, freezing, boiling with hot water, cramming pepper water, poisoning, attacking by hounds, starving, body splitting by horses (all kinds), hanging, skinning, mutilation, (gang) raping, live targets of shooting and flesh carving. … After the Japanese army retreated in May 1945, 25 shoulder pole loads of human bones were excavated, more than 2,700 skeletons were discovered across the area. … 18 women were raped (gang raped) before death, over 500 women were raped by brutal force; these women were stripped and raped in broad daylight, and “teased” before being raped, some even died from splitting the body with knife.”
Written on 11/20/1992 by Tang Qingyu of Kunming, Yunnan Province: “In 1941 when the Japanese Army invaded Western Yunnan, after Baoshan was conquered, large crowds of residents living in Baoshan and other places in Western Yunnan swarmed to Kunming to avoid slaughter by the Japanese Army. Immediately afterwards cholera broke out in Kunming. At first people thought it was epidemic plague, but soon it spread to the whole city. Those contracted cholera first would have symptoms of vomiting and diarrhea, and soon they died in less than one day. On the streets one could see dead people each day. Back then at the biggest and most famous coffin shop (the boss was surnamed Zhao) on Wenmiao Street in Kunming, all the coffins were sold out. … The Japanese army spread cholera bacteria in Western Yunnan, therefore the fleeing people of all social circles brought the cholera bacteria to Kunming and spread it around. … As mentioned above, the number of civilians suffering direct or indirect damage from the Japanese Army runs to thousands and millions. Newspapers published at that time all carried the story.”
As the result, Tong Zeng became the leader of the whole grievance and compensation movement in China. For example, he helped to establish and became the Chairman of the Chinese People’s Association for Compensation Against Japan. He gave voice to the thousands and millions of voiceless Chinese atrocity victims and provided an organized force to seek apology, justice, and compensation from the Japanese government, as well as those Japanese companies who were involved in slave laborers.
One of the accomplishments of this organized force is the negotiated settlement between former Chinese slave laborers of Mitsubishi Materials Corporation (or Mitsubishi for short) and Mitsubishi that was reached on 6/1/2016. The negotiated agreement included:
More than 70 years after the war ended, a portion of the atrocity victims finally received justice and compensation. However, this is only a small portion of the millions of atrocity victims. Much more hard work remains in the years ahead.
The thousands of letters that Tong Zeng received from atrocity victims were accumulated and kept in many boxes in his office.
When years and years have gone by and there was still no apology and compensation from Japan, Tong Zeng was worried such important archives could be lost from history with a theft or fire. So he tried to find a method of safe-keeping these letters. In early 2014 when a couple of Chinese Americans in the U.S. heard of this dilemma, they offered to work with Tong Zeng to develop a website to keep and post all the letters, including digitizing all these letters and translating a subset of the letters into English. This led to a joint collaborative project between a small Chinese team, led by Tong Zeng and his able assistant Meng Huizhong (孟惠忠), and a small Chinese American team of volunteers. After almost two years of hard work working almost days and nights, the initial website called “10,000 Cries for Justice” was completed, and this important historical archive has been posted in a bi-lingual website www.10000cfj.org. This important historical archive is now safe from loss due to thefts or fires. This website (the current address of this website is now “https://2018.10000cfj.org) is still being worked on, as only a small percentage of the letters have been translated into English. The goal is to eventually translate all these letters into Japanese also.
Because of the political climate at that time when China was still trying to establish diplomatic relations or build up its friendship with many countries, Tong Zeng did not always have the support of the Chinese government in what he was doing. As a matter of fact, when certain important visitors, e.g., Japan’s Prime Minister, were visiting Beijing, Tong Zeng’s employer, the National Committee on Aging, would arrange an out-of-town business trip for him so that he was not around Beijing just in case he would cause trouble.
As stated earlier, the whole compensation movement is far from completed, Tong Zeng and many other similar leaders will continue to work hard to restore justice and seek compensation for millions of other atrocity victims, so that all the voiceless victims can be heard and rest in peace.
Tamaki Matsuoka (松岡環) -The Conscience of Japan: One of the largest atrocities that the Japanese military inflicted on China was the Nanking Massacre which occurred for approximately six weeks starting from December. 13, 1937 to near the end of January 1938. During these six weeks, approximately 300,000 Chinese, most of them civilians and many were women and children, were slaughtered, and over 20,000 Chinese females (women, girls, and even very young girls and great grandmothers) were raped, and one third of the city of Nanking was burned to the ground.
Tamaki Matsuoka was born in Japan in 1947, and was an elementary school teacher. As she was growing up and as a young adult, she was taught and heard many different versions about the Nanking Massacre, including that it was fake and fabricated by the Chinese. So starting in the mid 1980s, she decided that she was going to find out for herself what really happened during the Nanking Massacre.
She did and spent more than 30 years of her adult life to find out just exactly what happened in Nanking during those six weeks. An ambitious and formidable task even for a person working full-time on such a project. But Tamaki had to earn a living working full-time as an elementary school teacher, and also together with her husband raising a family with two sons. She was able to work on this project only during the summers, school holidays, or weekends. Initially she only had herself to work on this project, and she had to pay for any incurred expenses (e.g., travel expenses between Japan and China). Furthermore, she endured a lot of criticisms and attacks from the Japanese right wing, including death threats.
But she endured this difficult, challenging, and dangerous journey. The journey was not easy at all. She exhibited courage, dedication, commitment, and sacrifice to achieve her objective. Among other accomplishments, she interviewed over 250 former Japanese soldiers who participated in the Nanking Massacre and over 300 Chinese survivors of the Nanking Massacre.
Even after establishing some initial contacts with former Japanese WWII veterans after posting an announcement in Japanese newspapers, she had to overcome significant cultural and political reluctance to talk about this sensitive subject. Again it took months or even years of building friendship with these veterans and gaining their trusts in the importance of the project that the veterans were willing to open up and discuss these long-held memories which they had not discussed with anyone else (including their immediate family members) for over half a century. Similarly, she had to overcome significant reluctance for the survivors to revisit the long suppressed terrifying dark memories of the past, including cultural reluctance to discuss being raped, and political reluctance to discuss atrocities committed by Japanese soldiers when at times the Chinese government was trying to establish friendlier relationship with the Japanese government.
By comparing notes of the perpetrators and victims, Tamaki matched up records and compiled testimonies of the mass slaughter, rape, arson, destruction, plunder and other unimaginable violence committed to the Nanking residents including women, elderly and children. Her work produced numerous presentations, research articles, films and several books, including winning the “Japan Congress of Journalists Prize” in 2003. A summary of her life-long project is summarized in the English book Torn Memories of Nanking , which should be a must-read book for everyone.
Thanks to her and others , the true picture of Nanking Massacre is gradually being revealed to the world with irrefutable evidence. Through these testimonies, there is an undeniable case for the existence of the Nanking Massacre as one of the most horrific atrocities in the history of humankind.
The best way to get a good sense of the Nanking Massacre is from interview statements that Tamaki recorded from Chinese survivors and Japanese soldiers. Here is a small sampling from her published English book.
How could humans use such atrocious treatments toward other humans? Although a complete explanation may not be found from the interview statements, they do mention some of the reasons.
I want to end this section on the Nanking Massacre with a quote of Mitani Sho, an 18 year old Japanese soldier whom Tamaki interviewed: “Until now, I had no opportunity to tell my story. After sixty years, I can finally give my testimony. I am extremely grateful. As a Japanese, I often reflect deeply on this episode. Today, however, many Japanese deny that the Nanjing Massacre or military sexual slavery took place. What kind of people are they? These people are trying to find an excuse to slowly change the interpretation of the Japanese constitution. Today, they are establishing a large military, and completely revamping the armed forces. In addition, they are trying to place the Japanese Army under U.S. command as an allied army that is prepared to fight American wars. Under a new security treaty and guidelines, Japan would be automatically pulled into any wars that the U.S. started. If such a situation were to arise, it is possible that events like the Nanjing Massacre could happen again. If we do not clearly state the historical truth and admit to this truth, we will not be able to establish a peaceful world for ourselves and our families.”
That is why Tamaki Matsuoka is known as “The Conscience of Japan.” 
Ending Remarks: Seventy fives years have transpired since the Second Sino-Japanese War ended in 1945. We must acknowledge what happened during that war, we must learn from that painful experience, so that that painful experience will not have to be endured by anyone else in this world in the future.
We must, like Tong Zeng, continue to speak for the voiceless. We must, like Tamaki Matsuoka, continue to spark the conscience of Japan.
I hope the following comments will be used to guide us in the future:
 You can find this White Paper (both English and Chinese versions) at “An Archive of Historic Cries for Justice Letters”: http://www.dontow.com/2015/09/an-archive-of-historic-cries-for-justice-letters/
 In the early 1990s when the majority of these letters were sent to Tong Zeng, many relatives and Chinese media personnel borrowed many of these letters. Because at that time copying machines were not readily available to Tong Zeng and other people in China, many of these letters were borrowed and unfortunately, most of them were never returned. That is why Tong Zeng now has only about 5,000 letters.
 For more sample letters from Tong Zeng’s collection, see “Sample Letters from Tong Zeng’s Collection of “10,000 Cries for Justice”: http://www.dontow.com/2018/03/sample-letters-from-tong-zengs-collection-of-10000-cries-for-justice/
 Torn Memories of Nanking, by Tamaki Matsuoka, ALPHA Education, 2016, ISBN 978-0-9920550-I-1 (paperback). Parts of this English book, plus other material, have previously been published in several other books in Japanese and Chinese by Tamaki Matsuoka.
 The most notable contributor was the late Iris Chang, who authored the best-selling book The Rape of Nanking: The Forgotten Holocaust of World War II, Basic Books, 1997.
 For more information about Tamaki Matsuoka, see “Torn Memories of Nanking – A Must Read”: http://www.dontow.com/2016/06/torn-memories-of-nanking-a-must-read/
A person with better health is in general less likely to become susceptible to getting sick, whether the illness is due to the new coronavirus Covid-19, or some other illness. Taiji is already known to give rise to a lot of benefits for health.  A 2019 article  has shown that modern scientific research during the past 25 years or so has provided preliminary confirmations of this long-standing belief; that article also provided an explanation why Taiji can give rise to such health benefits. A brief summary of that journal article can also be found in a recent article posted in this website. 
Therefore, the reasons that Taiji can give rise to all those health benefits can also be applied to why Taiji can be beneficial in preventing or overcoming any illness associated with the new coronavirus.
|Our discussion in this article will focus on the reasons associated with oxygen and blood circulation, stress reduction, correct posture, exercising your muscles, tendons, and ligaments, and increased immunity.|
Good health requires adequate supply of oxygen to various parts of our body. Although Taiji movements are soft and slow, Taiji is an aerobic exercise that provides oxygen and stimulates blood circulation. Taiji exercises your heart and lungs. It synchronizes with breathing, especially with lower abdominal breathing for experienced practitioners, and brings in more oxygen. Lower abdominal breathing also massages the internal organs inside your abdomen.
The fundamental principle of Taiji of relaxation can reduce stress. It is emphasized in almost every aspect of Taiji, including associated meditation exercises. Relaxation reduces anxiety, hypertension, diabetes, and ADHD. It soothes the mind, leads to better sleep quality, and reduces various bodily pains. On the one hand, it relaxes the mind, but on the other hand the mind is involved and leads the forms, and that may be why Taiji can slow down the onslaught of Alzheimer’s Disease.
Another fundamental principle of Taiji is to keep your upper back straight. This guiding principle manifests all throughout the Taiji movements and results in good posture. This guiding principle together with the emphasis on keeping your feet separated by a shoulder width lead to better balance and stability.
Taiji movements, as well as various accompanying warmup exercises such as the Eight Silk Brocade  or the self-massaging Paida exercises  stretch and strengthen your muscles, tendons, and ligaments, and increase flexibility. These exercises stimulate air and blood circulation throughout your body, and also strengthen all parts of your body, thus increasing your immune system.
As a matter of fact, more than 15 years ago, Taiji was found that it can increase immunity to shingles, caused by the reactivation of the chickenpox virus (the varicella-zoster virus, or VZV). Taiji can increase a person’s immunity by as much as taking the shingles vaccine VARIVAX. Furthermore, if a person takes the VARIVAX vaccine, practicing Taiji can increase that person’s immunity even more. 
Since Covid-19 is caused by a virus, increasing a person’s immunity is key to avoiding being infected with Covid-19, or recovering from it if one has been infected. Increasing one’s immunity, together with other health benefits, practicing Taiji can be an important part of our defense against the current global pandemic.
With the current global pandemic, we are faced with lockdown and staying at home. My personal experience has found that in some sense, this has been a blessing. Without the need to attend various activities outside of the home, and without needing to spend the time to drive to these activities, I find that I now have more time than before.
My Taiji practice takes about one hour per practice. But the practice consists of various components, such as warm-up stretching exercises, meditation exercises such as Eight Silk Brocade and Standing Meditation, Forms such as the Mixed-Style 42 Form or the Yang-Style 24 Form, and strength-building exercises. The components take about 15-20 minutes each, and could be as little as 5-10 minutes. Therefore, while I am preparing dinner, I can exercise one component, then while baking in the oven, or steaming in a wok, or cooking in a pressure cooker, I can do another component. Since all these activities are done at home, I can easily go from one activity to another. The end result is that I have found more time to do my Taiji practices on a more regular basis.
 See, e.g., “Health Benefits of Taiji”: http://www.dontow.com/2010/01/health-benefits-of-taiji/.
 Don M. Tow, “Health Benefits of Taiji,” Qi: The Journal of Traditional Eastern Health & Fitness, Volume 29, No. 3, Autumn 2019, pp. 20-28.
 A brief summary of that article can be found at “Trying to Understand Why Taiji Has So Many Health Benefits”: http://www.dontow.com/2019/09/trying-to-understand-why-taiji-has-so-many-health-benefits/.
 See, e.g., “A Set of Simple Time-Tested Health Exercises: The Eight Silk Brocade (八段錦)”: http://www.dontow.com/2018/12/a-set-of-simple-time-tested-health-exercises-the-eight-silk-brocade-%e5%85%ab%e6%ae%b5%e9%8c%a6/.
 “Lajing and Paida Therapy – Reviving Ancient Chinese Self-Healing Exercises”: http://www.dontow.com/2013/09/lajing-and-paida-therapy-reviving-ancient-chinese-self-healing-exercises/.
This is my reply to your 4/29/2020 email asking me for a donation for your presidential campaign and the Democratic Unity Fund.
First, let me say that I am a strong critic of President Trump and I would like to support Mr. Biden to be the next President of the U.S. and other Democratic candidates running for office in the 2020 election.
I think we are offered a golden opportunity to defeat Trump and to remove from office many incumbent national, state, and local Republicans. The main reason is due to the performance track record of Trump and the whole Republican Party during the last 3 years and 4 months:
The above track records provide ample reasons for removing Trump and his Republican yes-people from power, and provide critical and convincing arguments to choose Mr. Biden over Trump. If Mr. Biden and the Democratic Party would seize and focus on this poor performance record of Trump and the Republican Party, then you will be able to defeat Trump and the Republican Party come this November.
However, if Mr. Biden and the Democratic Party would try to outdo Trump in his bashing of China as in Mr. Biden’s recent “Unprepared” ad , then Mr. Biden and the Democratic Party will be unable to seize this golden opportunity, because instead of attacking Trump’s poor performance record where he is so vulnerable, your trying to outdo Trump in his bashing of China is not based on facts, and furthermore you are supporting Trump’s scapegoat excuse for his mistakes and incompetency.
China did not create the new coronavirus. On 12/31/2019, about a month after mysterious illnesses first appeared in Wuhan, China, the Chinese government alerted the WHO about these mysterious illnesses. On 1/11/2020, Chinese scientists posted to the world the genome of the mysterious new virus (now known as COVID-19). This led shortly after to WHO developing a template for preparing tests. Then many countries (such as Germany and South Korea) used this information to successfully develop diagnostic tests for COVID-19. Unfortunately, our country did not use the WHO template, and instead tried to develop our own test which took a long time to develop and the initial tests did not work.
Yes, China made some mistakes in its initial handling of this new mysterious infection, but it is understandable that such mistakes could have easily occurred in light of the newness of this infection. Just look how the U.S. and other countries on multiple occasions have revised their statistics and understanding of the origin and methods of spreading of this virus.
Almost on every step of the way, Trump has completely mismanaged our country’s response to COVID-19. After wasting about more than two months of critical time, he tried to cover up his own mistakes and find a scapegoat in China.
If Mr. Biden follows the same path, he is essentially validating Trump’s excuse and incorrectly and unfairly putting the blame on China. Furthermore, the kind of ads like “Unprepared” is not convincing and is unlikely to gain the support of other Democrats and undecided voters, and definitely not any Trump supporter.
Another consequence is that you help to create phobic against China and Chinese Americans, as well as Asian Americans. This just contributes to more racism in our country. Does Mr. Biden want to scare away and lose the votes and support of Chinese Americans, as well as Asian Americans which is the fastest growing racial/ethnic group in the U.S.
Mr. Biden and the Democratic Party need the votes and support of a cross spectrum of Americans, including a progressive coalition as well as younger voters. Your campaign must be based on criticizing the lousy performance record of Trump and the Republican Party, instead of finding a scapegoat in China.
Mr. Biden, do you want to seize this golden opportunity and provide leadership and hope to restore our great country as the beacon of the world, or do you want to go down in history as the person who caused this great country to suffer through another four years of Trump?
 This “Unprepared” ad was launched on 4/18/2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PmieUrXwKCc]]>
Due to the coronavirus, the world is facing a pandemic and a major economic downturn. This is happening all over the world, but the implications for the U.S. may be the greatest in terms of the American people’s health, the country’s economy, and the upcoming political elections. A lot of these are the results from the actions of President Donald Trump.
This article has 4 sections. Part I has Sections I and II, and Part II has Sections III and IV.
This article first summarizes significant timelines of the coronavirus (Section I). Then it discusses several of President Trump’s specific remarks or actions with respect to the coronavirus (Section II). Then it discusses the implications of these remarks and actions upon the health of the American public, the people’s livelihood and their pocket books, and the impacts on this fall’s American elections (Section III). The article ends with some comments on the need to eliminate discriminatory double standards (Section IV).
Because this article is long, we have separated the article into Part I and Part II. This is Part I (placed in the “Political/Social Commentary” page) and includes Sections I and II. Part II (placed in the “Other” page in this same March 2020 release of this website) includes Sections 3 and 4.
Section I: Significant Timelines
Before we discuss President Trump’s actions and various impacts, we first provide a timeline of significant events during the last four months.
In summary, in 3-4 months, the new coronavirus has spread rapidly all over the world. It is going to get worse before it can get better. It is going to take drastic national and international leadership to overcome this pandemic. Currently in only a few countries, like China and S. Korea, the situation seems to be stabilizing and improving (e.g., significant reduction in the number of new infections, or the number of recovered cases becomes more and more than new cases).
Section II: President Trump’s Significant Remarks or Actions
As our country’s top leader, what President Trump does or says has tremendous impacts on the directions and operations of the whole governing apparatus of the country, and therefore on the livelihood, physical and mental health, and spirit of the citizens of this country, including the pocketbooks of our citizens and the bottom lines of our businesses. Therefore, let’s recall many of President Trump’s actions and words since the beginning of 2020 when the new coronavirus became known to the U.S. and the world.
1. On 1/22/2020, the day after the first coronavirus case was confirmed by the CDC, President Trump, when asked “are there worries about a pandemic at this point,”‘ in a CNBC TV interview at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, responded “No, Not al all. And we have it totally under control. It’s one person coming in from China, and we have it under control. It’s going to be just fine.”
2. On 1/24, Trump again told Americans that there was no reason to worry, and “it will all work out well.” On 1/30 in a speech in Michigan, he said “We have it very well under control. We have very little problem in this country at this moment — five. And those people are all recuperating successfully.”
3. On 1/31, the day after the WHO declared the coronavirus a global emergency, President Trump put on a travel restriction on China, to and from China, effective starting on 2/2/2020. This was a positive step, but it was far from enough as clearly shown below.
4. On 2/10 on 3 different occasions, Trump made the remark “Looks like by April, you know, in theory, when it gets little warmer, it miraulously goes away.” However, his statement is not supported by science or infectious disease experts in his administration, and presently there is no indication that the coronavirus may diminish significantly with warmer weather, like the common flu.
5. On 2/19, Trump told a Phoenix TV station “I think the numbers are going to get progressively better as we go along.” Four days later he said the the situation is “very much under control” and “we had 12, at one point. And now they’ve gotten very much better. Many of them are fully recovered.”
6. For several weeks starting around mid February, President Trump and some of his officials on several occasions said that testing is available to anyone who wants such a test. That was just not true, although that statement was repeatedly made. First, the testing kit was not available to anyone who wants a test. It was not necessarily available even if a doctor has prescribed such a test and the patient has symptoms of the infection. The testing kits were only distributed by the CDC to selected agencies. Furthermore, there was a serious problem with these test kits because the tests were not accurate. The U.S.’s development of their test kit should be compared with what S. Korea did, who has been offering free testing of about 10,000 people per day since the middle of February, with a test cost of about $20 each. Furthermore, in S. Korea once a test has been proven in the laboratory, normally it takes a long time (e.g., many months) to get it approved for general use for the public. In the case of the coronavirus test kit, it got approval in one week!  It is a little unclear what is the cost of each test. It is $20 according to the first article in Ref. , but the cost is listed as $134 in Ref. .
The federal government via CDC and FDA (Food Drug Administration) set down very strict guidelines on who can prepare such test kits, diallowing reputable research labs on the forthfront of such research to conduct more general testing even when they have shown success in their laboratory. More information on this problem is described in .
7. Even on 3/6 after a briefing in a visit to CDC in Atlanta, Trump mentioned again that “anyone who wants a test can get a test.” But that evening at the White House VP Pence, who is leading the administration response, knows better and would not commit to that, but said doctors treating potentially symptomatic Americans could contact local officials and have state labs do the testing.
8. Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has repeatedly said that the test program that CDC has been working on has not met what has been advertised, and in a testimony in Congress on 3/11 said that any vaccine for the coronavirus is at least a year to a year and a half away.
9. On 3/11 evening, in a nationwide address from his White House desk, Trump for the first time acknowledged the seriousness of the coronavirus situation in the U.S. and that the problem is not going away soon. At this time, the whole country was cancelling large gatherings including the NCAA basketball tournament and the NBA, and everyone was planning to cancel various gatherings, including schools and even medium size gatherings. Yet, in his speech there was no mention or guidance on this important issue.
The only major action announced by President Trump was additional traffic restriction from and to Europe, effective starting at midnight 3/13. Even on that, President Trump made three important mistakes. One mistake in his announcement is that the restriction does not apply to Americans who are returning from Europe. That caused a lot of anxiety for Americans who were in Europe at that time, and caused many of them taking very expensive flights home. The second mistake is that the restriction applies only to people, and does not apply to trade and cargo. The third mistake is that Ireland was also exempt, just like Great Britain. But there was no explanation for the announced exception, even though Great Britain has more infections than some of the other countries in Europe. Just like many decisions of Trump, his decisions are arbitrary, and not well thought out.
His justification for the travel restriction is that there are more infections today in Europe than in the U.S., but ignoring that perhaps we have lower infections may be due to our behind in the testing. There was no mention of any other step to reduce the seriousness of the coronavirus.
It is then not surprising at all that on the next day on 3/12, the DJIA dropped by 2,352 points (or 10%), the worst drop since 1987.
10. On 3/13 afternoon, reacting to the large dissatisfaction shown all over the country to his performance on his 3/11 nationwide address and to the next day’s huge market drop in the stock market, President Trump gave another nationwide address from the White House. He declared a national emergency that will provide $50 billions to fund various support programs. He waived interest on student loans.
Together with a large group of CEOs, he also announced a series of measures to help protect the health of our citizens, e.g., Walmart and Target would allow their parking lots to be testing sites. Trump also made two mistakes in his announcement. One mistake is that he said that insurance companies will waive all copays for coronavirus treatments. In reality, insurance companies only agreed to waive the copays for coronavirus testing. The second mistake that he said that Google has 1,700 engineers working to develop a website to help people find a test location. In reality, Verify, a subsidiary of Google’s parent company, Alphabet, with a total workforce of only 1,000 people is working on a website related to the coronavirus. More information about this disparity can be found in .
Declaring a national emergency is necessary, and some of the proposed actions are necessary. However, what President Trump said was again full of false information or half truths. Furthermore, in response to a question, Trump said he is not responsible for any delay, even though it was his administration who in May 2018 canceled the pandemic preparedness office within the National Security Council, and for the 2021 budget proposed a budget cut of 15% (or $1.2 billion) for the CDC and a $35 million decrease to the Infectious Diseases Rapid Response Reserve Fund. Again, he doesn’t admit to mistakes and loses more credibility.
The stock market did rise significantly (by almost 2,000 points for the DJIA). However, about half of that gain occurred during the last hour of trading when there was a lot of news that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnunchin were very close to reaching a large relief package in Congress.
11. On 3/16, President Trump in another nationwide address mentioned that the Federal Reserve the day before has reduced interest rate to almost 0%. He emphasized that people should avoid any gatherings of more than 10 people and to practice group distancing, and acknowledged that the coronavirus may not reach a peak until July or August.
In spite of reducing the interest rate to almost 0% and the prospect of Congress passing a significant relief package, the stock market crashed. For example, the DJIA dropped by almost 3,000 points on 3/16, and has dropped by 29% since 1/1/2020. Again, this is not surprising, because testing is still not yet widely available, implying that the situation will get even more worse, and the whole country is almost closing down, thus basically shutting down all business, and it is going to cause the government to spend a large amount of money to keep people above water, thus increasing significantly the federal deficit and the national debt
Nevertheless, in a response to a question, President Trump rated himself 10 on a rating of 1 to 10.
This ends Part I of this article. Part II is in the “Other” page of this same release (March 2020).
 “China Grapples With Mystery Pneumonia-Like Illness” by S.-L. Wee and V. Wang, the New York Times, 1/6/2020 and revised on 1/21/2020.
 “How testing failures allowed coronavirus to sweep the U.S.” by J. Kenen, Politico, March 6, 2020.
 S. Korea’s test was based on a WHO template which is available to the world. The CDC in the U.S. decided to create their own test from scratch, only to see that effort plagued by delay and dysfunction that continues to this day. More information on this can be found in the following two articles: (1) “How this South Korean company created coronavirus test kits in three weeks” by I. Watson, S. Jeong, J. Hollingsworth and T. Booth, CNN, March 12, 2020. (2) “How South Korea Scaled Coronavirus Testing While the U.S. Fell Dangerously Behind” by S. Engelberg, L. Song and L. Dephillis, ProPublica, March 15, 2020.
 “South Korea is doing 10,000 coronavirus tests a day. The U.S. is struggling for even a small fraction of that” by M. J. Kim and S. Denyer, The Washington Post, March 13, 2020.
 ” ‘It’s Just Everywhere Already’: How Dellays in Testing Set Back the U.S. Coronavirus Response,” by S Fink and M. Baker, the New York Times, March 10, 2020.
 “The Google and Verily coronavirus websites are off to a rocky start,” by A. C. Estes, recode, March 16, 2020.
In the 2014 edition of the document “Crisis Emergency Risk Communication” published by the CDC that first came out under George W. Bush’s presidency (2001-2008), the subheading is “Be First. Be Right. Be Credible.”  On page 2 of that document, besides those three principles, it added three more, and states “Throughout this book, six principles of effective crisis and risk communiction are emphasized:
Unfortunately, President Trump during the coronavirus crisis has not exhibited any of these six principles. As a matter of fact, he has exhibited the opposite of these six principles:
This has been clearly shown and documented in Section II (Part I) of our article. As a matter of fact, the previous section has clearly shown that President Trump has completely mismanaged the whole coronavirus crisis; he has repeatedly lied and dispatched completely false information or at best half truths; he does not understand the problem, and doesn’t allow the appropriate knowledgeable people to run with managing the crisis. He has completely underestimated the problem, and wasted several weeks of valuable time to attack the problem.
Actually this kind of behavior is typical of President Trump during his whole presidency on almost everything he has done. He has always lied, provided no legitimate reasons for his deeds and words, he has always attacked and made fun of other people, showing no compassion or understanding of other people’s circumstances, and he often does not take actions to try to solve problems in a timely manner, if at all. Yet, it seems that he remains popular to his loyalists and a portion of the American public. It doesn’t seem that in the past he has lost a lot of his popularity. Is it different now?
Yes, it is different with the coronavirus emergency. In the past, his deeds and words did not affect the people loyal to him, at least not in the near term. Life can go on as usual.
However, in the current coronavirus crisis, everyone’s health and life could be affected. In other words, our own existence could be terminated. Furthermore when the whole society is basically shutting down, you may no longer be able to work, go to school, have any recreations, visit your friends and relatives, including not even being allowed to go outside of your own home. You may end up with no job, no income, your savings and all your assets may evaporate with the crashing stock market and the shutting down of all industries. In addition, the government is so heavy in debts due to massive relief programs and great reductions in income from taxes, putting all future generations at risk.
Anyone, including the Trump loyalists, can see the adverse impacts on themselves. Even the wealthy people, including the top 1-2 % rich people can see their wealth diminishing rapidly and their whole lifestyles for themselves and their children disappearing before their eyes. Perhaps sooner or later, even the Republican political leaders at the federal,/state/local levels may decide that blindly following Trump may not be good for their own political careers.
I think we are beginning to see that now. You can sense that from the people around you. including Republicans. You can sense that some cracks may be emerging from the Republicans around you, and even among the Republican political leaders. Right now, the polls show that Democrats are much more concerned about the coronavirus crisis. However, since in all likelihood, the coronavirus crisis in the U.S. and most other parts of the world is going to get worse before getting better. Sooner or later when the crisis impacts their and their family members’ health, livelihood, and their pocketbook, they will be very much concerned about the coronavirus crisis, and will understand that blindly following Trump is not going to lead them to see light at the end of the tunnel.
I think this change in mood and assessment of President Trump is already reflected in the recent Democratic primary election.
Of course, this was for the Democratic Party. We won’t know until the election in November. My guess is that this attitude will be pervasive across the whole country, and Trump will be defeated in November.
We end this section with some suggestions:
IV: Comments on the Need to Eliminate Discriminatory Double Standards
Yes, the new coronavirus was first found in Wuhan, China in late 2019. It then spread rapidly to other parts of China and then to the rest of the world. But it was not a virus that China purposedly spread to other parts of the world. China is as much a victim as other countries of the world. As a matter of fact, China so far has suffered the most infections and deaths than any other country.
Even though China should have better handled the initial warning of a new epidemic, China did quickly share its information with the world, including Chinese scientists posting on 1/11/2020 the genome of the mysterious new virus. That information quickly led to the WHO and other countries to develop a template for preparing tests. Such testing kits resulted in quickly testing and controlling the spread of the virus in countries like S. Korea, Germany, and Singapore. That is why the WHO has repeatedly praised China on its actions.
Instead of repeatedly focusing on a mishap during the initial moments of a new and confusing mysterious development, the world should also remember how quickly China share the information on the genome of the new virus determined by Chinese scientists that led to the quick development of widely available test kits. We should focus on how we can work together to attack this new global problem.
While facing this massive challenge of a new and rapidly spreading deadly disease, the Chinese government adopted draconian measures to isolate Wuhan. Instead of trying to understand why the Chinese government adopted such measures, many people outside of China quickly criticized China to adopt such undemocratic steps limiting people’s livelihoods and personal liberties.
A good example of discriminatory double standards is how the New York Times depicts the lockdown around Wuhan in a 3/8/2020, 10:30 AM article and a similar lockdown around northern Italy in another 3/8/2020, 10:50 AM article (20 minutes later). In the former, it describes the measure “at great cost to people’s livelihoods and personal liberties,” while in the latter, it describes the measure as “an effort to contain Europe’s worst coronavirus outbreak.” 
An example of a choice of racist words is the Wall Street Journal‘s February 3, 2020 editorial article titled “China Is the Real Sick Man of Asia.” The WSJ still has not apologized for such use of racist words.
Another example of racist words is President Trump referring to the coronavirus as the “Chinese Virus” made in a speech on March 16, 2020. Even though in the past, some illnesses were named after certain locality or origin, times have changed and now we should be more careful with such designations. For example, before 1978 hurricanes were named only with women’s names. That has changed. You would expect that the president of the U.S. would be more sensitive so his comments would not lead to more unwarranted racist attacks on Chinese Americans.
With such usage of racist remarks and double standards by the NYT, the WSJ, and President Trump, is it then surprising to see so many random attacks on Chinese Americans on the streets of the U.S.? This is another lesson we should learn from the coronavirus crisis.
 “Crisis Emergency Risk Communication” 2014 Edition, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services. The first edition was published under President George W. Bush’s administration (2001-2008).
 Click “The description in Chinese including pictures of the two articles” for a description of the two articles in Chinese, and click “the description in English without pictures of the two articles” for a description in English of the two articles.]]>
By Taiji-like exercises we are referring to exercises that include warm-up exercises that we usually do at the beginning of each class or self-practice , and breathing/stretching/meditation exercises like the Eight Silk Brocade Qigong  exercises. We will discuss two types of people with limited mobility handicaps:
I. People Seated in Wheelchairs: These are people who are seated in wheetchairs, but can still move their arms and legs. There are still quite a few exercises that these people can do. We now discuss several of them.
II. People with Limited Mobility Capability: This set of exercises is for those who can stand up and walk, although slowly and not always steadily. When walking, be sure to pay attention to the following two principles as discussed in Ref. 3:
For these people, all the exercises discussed in Section I for people in wheelchairs can also be done by people who can stand up and walk. Besides the three Eight Silk Brocade Qigong exercises discussed in Section I, they can also do the other five Eight Silk Brocade Qigong exercises of Ref. 2. Furthermore, while doing these exercises, they can also squat down if it is prescribed by the exercise.
In addition, here are a couple more exercises they can do:
In summary, people with limited physical mobility can also do many Taiji-like warm-up, stretching, and Qigong exercises, and thus benefit from many health benefits of Taiji. These are relatively simple exercises and can be taught and learned easily. They do not require a lot of room. The exercises can be practiced for extended periods like 30-60 minutes, or as short as 10-15 minutes. Practicing them several times per week will do wonders to your health and increase your vitality and raise your spirit.
 See, e.g., Don M. Tow, “Health Benefits of Taiji,” Qi: The Journal of Traditional Eastern Health & Fitness, Volume 29, No. 3, Autumn 2019, pp. 20-28. A shorter version of this article can also be found in the article “Trying to Understand Why Taiji Has So Many Health Benefits” in the September 2019 article in this website.
 See, an earlier article in this website: “A Set of Simple Time-Tested Health Exercises: The Eight Silk Brocade (八段錦).”
 See the earlier article “Walking Tips and Taiji” in this website. Click here for the link to this article.
 However, when walking backward, you don’t have to first step down on your heel before stepping down on your toes. because when moving backward, your support still relies more on the front foot.]]>
First of all, a country has its sovereignty, which another country should not interfere with. This not only applies to governments, but as well as to private companies (whether it is business or sports) so that a private company should not interfere in the internal affairs of another country. Hong Kong is definitely a part of China, even though for the next 27 years it is still under two systems and one country. Therefore, a government or a private company from another country should not interfere in the internal affairs of China, including Hong Kong.
Just like in a crowded theatre, freedom of speech does not allow someone to yell out “fire” when there is no actual fire. In other words, freedom of speech does not guarantee that anyone can say anything.
One may argue that if there are obvious massive atrocities or injustices that a large number of people are suffering from their own government, then perhaps there could be argument that could justify a foreign country interfering in another country’s internal affair. But that is not the case in Hong Kong. As we in an earlier article  had analyzed the situation in Hong Kong and explained that Hong Kong may have its underlying economic/social/political issues, these are not issues introduced by the Chinese government since the return of Hong Kong to China. As a matter of fact, as we explained in that article, China if not restrained by the “two systems one country” concept could have made major improvements on these issues.
The protests have been going on for about half a year now and there seems to be much support, especially among the young people, including school age students. However, some of the major goals of these protests, such as more freedom and human rights, were even more lacking during the 150 years of colonial rule under Great Britain. Furthermore, according to the Canadian Fraser Institute’s latest Human Freedom Index of 2019, Hong Kong ranks third in the world, far better than that of the United States, which ranks 15th.  Although the mass media seems to emphasize police brutality. Any honest assessment of the violence and brutality will show that they were due mostly to the protestors, with numerous and massive destruction of public facilities such as the Hong Kong metro system, innumerable use of Molotov and other explosive devices, resulting in many injuries to ordinary people and police. In any other country, including the U.S., the government would have called out the National Guard and arrested the protestors and restored peace. Instead of pointing this out, the U.S. government has been actively coaching, supporting, financing, and praising the violent protestors, and mobilizing the full cheer-leading support of their mass media.
Without having a better understanding of the situation in Hong Kong, no wonder that the NBA Commissioner Adam Silver has publicly stated that there will be no reprimand of Daryl Morey. With the possible exception of LeBron James’ criticism of Morey’s tweet, the American public seems to think that freedom of speech should encourage and support Morey’s tweet. As a matter of fact, LeBron James has received a lot of criticisms that seem to accuse him of just trying to protect his own financial interest.
Unfortunately during the Hong Kong protests, it is the ordinary people and businesses of Hong Kong that are suffering. Does the U.S. government really care? It seems that their major goal is to weaken and destroy China, the U.S.’s major competitor, even if it ruins Hong Kong’s economy and its livelihood for many people. Recently U.S Congress has passed a bill and President Trump has signed the bill. supporting the protests in Hong Kong.  So much for justice, democracy, and human rights!
Where were they when without any doubt the Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi was murdered inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul?  Because the Saudi government, although not necessary the Saudi people, is a major ally of the U.S. and is rich in oil, the U.S. government just looked the other way. Where were they when Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s seems to be trying to establish a Hindu-only nation?  Again, India borders China and is a useful ally to counter China. So the U.S. government so far has essentially not taken any action against India. One can conclude that the U.S. government does not really consistently use freedom, democracy, and human rights to govern their actions, but only uses them as an attack weapon whenever it suits them.
One will probably point out what about the situation in Xinjiang where it has been reported that the Chinese government has detained millions of Uyghurs. However, as has recently been pointed out by Ajit Singh and Max Blumenthal that this accusation, even though it has been widely circulated, is based on two highly dubious claims.  The dubious study that first came out with the “million detained” figure was popularized by a Washington, DC-based NGO that is backed by the US government, the “Network of Chinese Human Rights Defenders,” which gave its estimate based on interviewing a grand total of eight people. The second study is based on flimsy media reports by a far rightist who believes that he is “led by God” on a mission against China
The American mass media should not just blindly follow the direction of the American government. Instead, it should fully exercise their independence to provide an independent check and analysis of the truth. The American people should also not be blindly led by the U.S. government to try to weaken and overthrow another government, as it has done so in so many other countries during the last many years.
 Hong Kong: Past, Present, and Future”: http://www.dontow.com/2019/09/hong-kong-past-present-and-future/.
 The Human Freedom Index 2019: https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/human-freedom-index-2019.
 See, e.g., CNBC’s November 27, 2019 news article: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/11/27/trump-signs-bill-backing-hong-kong-protesters-into-law-in-spite-of-beijings-objections.html
 “Assassination of Jamal Khashoggi”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassination_of_Jamal_Khashoggi.
 “As Protests Rage on Citizenship Bill, Is India Becoming a Hindu Nation?”: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/16/world/asia/india-citizenship-protests.html.
 Ajit Singh and Max Blumenthal, “China Detaining millions of Uyghurs? Serious problems with claims by US-backed NGO and far-right researcher ‘led by God’ against Beijing”: https://thegrayzone.com/2019/12/21/china-detaining-millions-uyghurs-problems-claims-us-ngo-researcher/.
From the very beginning, Tai chi is always known as a good martial art (for both defense and offense), as well as a good health exercise (both physical and psychological health). As a good martial art, throughout the hundreds of years of its existence, Tai chi has repeatedly demonstrated this fact. Although its health benefits have also been known for hundreds of years, such health benefits have not been proven or supported by modern scientific/medical research investigations.
However, during the last 25 years or so, many scientific/medical investigations have been conducted showing that many of the traditionally claimed health benefits are real, although many more such studies are still needed in terms of larger sample sizes and duplication of results by different research teams at multiple places. 
At the launching ceremony, Zhu Kai, director of the sports department at People’s Daily and the president of the People’s Sports, said the platform will integrate sports and medical care; develop sports prescriptions for occupational, chronic and common diseases, promote care of the elderly and spread traditional culture. In other words, this Integrated Tai Chi Platform will work together with the necessary resources across the whole spectrum of the society and the world to provide scientific/medical evidence on the areas of applicability (including its limits) on the health benefits of Tai chi.
Wang Haitao, dean of the School of Continuing Education of Peking Union Medial college, pointed out it’s time to break out of the wall of the hospital, and the hospital’s professionals and China’s traditional sports and hobbies be combined to have positive and health prospect, which can effectively manage and control the chronic diseases.
People’s Tai Chi platform will also unite several organizations and institutes to found the People’s Tai Chi Development Alliance, aiming to mobilize forces from the wider society and around the world to promote tai chi. Hopefully the more than 50 million people in China and the more than 150 million people in more than 159 countries in the world who practice tai chi will gain even more benefits from tai chi and help to spread tai chi.
Later, more than 30 famous tai chi masters from different styles become tai chi culture promotion ambassadors for the first public health campaign of this alliance.
Although a large number of adults practice tai chi, tai chi can also be very beneficial for young people, including young children. Tai chi should not be considered to be only a good exercise for senior adults, but it is a good exercise for people of all ages: seniors, middle age, young adults, teenagers, and children, and for males and females. It can be especially a good exercise for the increasingly large number of young children who are obese or who are experiencing various degrees of ADHD (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder). I hope that this People’s Tai Chi platform can make progress in this important but difficult challenge.
 See, e.g., Global Times, March 31, 2019. Tai chi is also spelled as Taiji.
 See, e.g., a recent summary article “Health Benefits of Taiji” of many such scientific/medical research investigations: D. M. Tow, “Health Benefits of Taiji” in the Autumn 2019, Volume 29, No. 3 issue of Qi: The Journal of Traditional Eastern Health & Fitness, pp. 20-28. A shorter version can also be found in the article “Trying to Understand Why Taiji Has So Many Health Benefits”: http://www.dontow.com/2019/09/trying-to-understand-why-taiji-has-so-many-health-benefits/.]]>
Although it is true that Christianity is mostly concerned about the future world of life after death, it does not mean that Christians should not pay attention to their actions in today’s world. As a matter of fact, Jesus during his time on earth stressed the importance of caring for others and being honest. For example, Philippians 4:8-9 states “brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things. What you have learned and received and heard and seen in me—practice these things, and the God of peace will be with you.”
This means that these are the standards that we should use to govern our lives, and these are the standards we should ask our leaders to follow. Therefore we should use these standards to decide whom should we elect to lead our country so that the people of our country and of our world will benefit the most.
With President Trump’s constant lies, his lack of concern for others, his complete disregard for the rule of law, his purposed neglect of the world environment that could result in an unlivable world for future generations, and the main force driving him in his decisions is mostly his own wealth, fame, and power. It is obvious that he is the antithesis of what a Christian life should be like following Jesus’ teachings, and that is why Christianity Today published an editorial that “Trump Should Be Removed from Office.”
It is actually a reflection of the great degradation of the moral fabric of our society that it is still debatable whether President Trump should continue to be our President for a second term. It is already very clear that he has violated the Ten Commandments more than any other U.S. president, and probably more than the sum of half a dozen or a dozen previous presidents. 
The recent Christianity Today editorial should serve as an alarm to us. Christians need to make a conscious assessment of President Trump’s presidency, whether he should be impeached, and whether he should be reelected for a second term as the President of the U.S. If we do not do this assessment, then we do not deserve to be called Christians.
 “Trump Should Be Removed from Office,” December 19, 2019 editorial by Mark Galli, Editor-in-Chief of Christianity Today: https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2019/december-web-only/trump-should-be-removed-from-office.html.
 See e.g., the article “Evangelical Christians, the Ten Commandments, and 2016 Presidential Election”: http://www.dontow.com/2017/03/evangelical-christians-the-ten-commandments-and-2016-presidential-election/.