Imagine the different response the CCP would evoke from Taiwan if, instead of constantly sending warplanes on “surprise visits” close to Taiwanese air space!!!, the CCP would help Taiwan solve its (e.g.) air pollution, Summer heat, or typhoon problems!!!
Or, if not, why not?
What am I missing here?
“Taiwan reports China’s largest incursion yet to air defence zone.
China has stepped up its diplomatic, military and economic pressure in recent years on the self-governed island to accept Beijing’s rule.”
]]>Regardless, cheers to Sherry Chen for prevailing the 10-years hardship and obtained the final win. As an Chinese American, I encourage everyone of us should be strong and resilient when fighting the unfair prosecutions like this one.
Best, Larry, a retired silicon valley techie.
]]>Organizations that support peace are important. All governments have done good as well as evil things to others. With education one can learn to make choices that help humanity. Unfortunately sometimes these choices are shortsighted as with the last administration and create massive problems which slow the growth of peace. You are correct in advocating support for organizations that work to stem the silliness that is growing in the US and elsewhere worldwide. But education is the key. Good education.
]]>Your question to Tamaki, “Did you know that this project would consume you full time ……”, probably, a similar question applies to your website too. Various related articles in your website indicate numerous time, effort, & energy spent before publication. I understand your endurance because many years ago I worked on a web-page on the Chinese-Americans’ contribution to the development of USA.
]]>You have the courage to select “untouchable” topics and discuss it openly. That is very rare in the Chinese American community, and in the mainstream media. I salute you for that.
However, I like to encourage you to greatly improve the quality of your publications. One example is your statement “then it crosses the openly stated red line of the People’s Republic of China,”. When you raise such a point, you are obligated to tell your readers what this “openly stated red line of PRC” is, and reference your source(s). Your current publications read to me that you are stating your personal views. It lacks the authority of a carefully researched article.
Thank you. Please keep doing what you are doing, but greatly improve the quality of your publications. S. B. Woo
PS: I don’t understand your 2nd and 3rd boxes above. Please give more explanation. Thank you.
]]>